Engineering Solutions
We fix the systems everyone else is afraid to touch.
What this is
Sometimes the problem isn't that you need AI. Sometimes the problem is that your system is broken, slow, or about to fall over, and your team is too deep in the weeds to see the way out. That's where we come in.
We do two things: fix existing systems and build new ones. On the corrective side, we diagnose root causes, untangle architectural messes, and ship targeted fixes that actually solve the problem instead of papering over it. On the greenfield side, we design and build systems with clean architecture from day one.
We bring senior engineering judgment to hard problems. Not a team of juniors following a playbook — experienced engineers who have seen these failure patterns before and know how to resolve them.
Who it's for
Teams staring at a system that's become a liability. The deploy pipeline is held together with hope. The database queries that used to take milliseconds now take seconds. The architecture made sense three years ago but the product has outgrown it.
Startups that need senior engineering horsepower for a critical build without committing to a full-time hire. Companies launching new products where getting the architecture right from the start matters more than moving fast and breaking things.
If your team is talented but stretched thin and you need someone who can parachute in, understand the problem quickly, and ship a real fix — that's what we do.
How it works
Every engagement starts with diagnosis. Even if you think you know what's wrong, we verify it. We audit the relevant systems, trace the actual failure path, and confirm root causes before touching anything. A lot of expensive fixes fail because they address symptoms, not sources.
Then we fix it. The highest-leverage changes go first — the ones that reduce risk or restore stability before anything structural gets touched. We ship incrementally so you're seeing real improvements at each step, not waiting for a six-month rewrite.
Greenfield projects follow the same principle: define the architecture, build the core, validate it early. Your team is in every design conversation throughout so there's no knowledge cliff when the engagement ends.
What you get
For corrective engagements: a diagnostic report identifying root causes and recommended fixes, followed by the implemented solutions in your codebase. Every change comes with tests and documentation.
For greenfield projects: a production-ready system with clean architecture, comprehensive test coverage, CI/CD pipeline, and documentation. Built to be maintained by your team long after we leave.
In both cases, you get a technical summary covering what we did, why we did it, and what to watch for going forward. We transfer knowledge to your team so the improvements stick.